People v. Marconi
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J., pro tem.
The evidence, though not without its conflicts, is plainly sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion that the appellant was guilty of manslaughter. He was shown to have been driving a fairly heavy car, at night, on a curving road, and to have been to the left of the center line when his car collided head on with one in which a Mr. Newhard was riding. Mr. Newhard died as a result of the injuries received. All the elements of the crime of manslaughter were established. (People v. Thomas, (1922) 58 Cal. App. 308 [208 Pac. 343].)
Complaint is made of two rulings of the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. CrossanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. SchmiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Heald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- People v. PociaskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. FreudenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.