Legal Opinion
Merced County Mut. Fire Ins. v. ST. OF CALIFORNIA
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 1991No. F014537PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J. *
Plaintiff and appellant Merced County Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Merced Mutual) appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after sustaining without leave to amend defendant and respondent State of California’s (State) demurrer to the first amended complaint.
The State demurred to the original complaint on the grounds it failed to include an indispensable party and failed to state a cause of action for rescission. The court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend. Merced Mutual filed a first amended complaint which added the estate of James King as a defendant, but…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brookwood v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bunnett v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Reveles v. Toyota by the BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.