Legal Opinion

Ezzes v. Ackerman

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 19, 1967PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Chief Justice:

These consolidated appeals are from two orders of the Court of Chancery. One denied plaintiff’s motion to stay further proceedings in this cause to permit the trial to go forward in a companion action brought by this plaintiff in the Federal District Court of Delaware. The second granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the ground that the action was barred by reason of res judicata. The two appeals were filed separately but were consolidated for the purpose of decision.

This is a derivative action brought against Chrysler Corporation and certain of its officers and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Auerbach v. Cities Service CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  3. Hoffman v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  4. Dann v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  5. Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. John Cottrell v. Michael DukeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Maldonado v. FlynnCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
  5. J.L. v. BarnesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API