Legal Opinion

John Cottrell v. Michael Duke

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 18, 2013No. 12-3871PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

In Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that exceptional circumstances may permit a federal court to refrain from hearing a case and instead defer to a concurrent, parallel state-court proceeding. The question in this appeal is whether a federal court may utilize Colorado River to stay a federal shareholder-derivative proceeding that contains a valid claim within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts. We hold that such a case may not be stayed pursuant to Colorado River. Thus, we vacate the stay…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Ernest Bock, LLC v. Paul SteelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Phyllis Schlafly Revocable Trust v. CoriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. Spellman v. Express Dynamics, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. Stainbrook v. Minnesota Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  5. Lawrence Arduini v. IgtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API