Legal Opinion

Dann v. Chrysler Corporation

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 31, 1963No. Civ. A. Nos. 1330, 1585PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

198 A.2d 185 (1963)

Sol A. DANN et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of Delaware, et al., Defendants.

Mary L. GALLO and A. James Gallo, Plaintiffs,

v.

Paul C. ACKERMAN et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. Nos. 1330, 1585.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

December 31, 1963.

Motions for Reargument Denied February 7, 1964.

Daniel O. Hastings, Clarence W. Taylor and Russell J. Willard, Jr., of Hastings, Taylor & Willard, Wilmington; Lewis M. Dabney, Jr., and Herbert Robinson, New York City; and Frank Rosenbaum of Dann, Rosenbaum, Bloom & Kaufman of Detroit, Michigan, for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Manacher v. ReynoldsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  3. Krinsky v. HelfandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. Krinsky v. HelfandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
  5. Nadler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  3. Schreiber v. BryanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  4. Ezzes v. AckermanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. Michelson v. DuncanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API