Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Dann
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 17, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
205 A.2d 343 (1964)
Arthur HOFFMAN, Erwin H. Ezzes, Herman Koenigsberg and Virginia S. Hudson et al., Appellants,
v.
Sol A. DANN et al. and Mary L. Gallo et al., Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, and
Chrysler Corporation et al. and Paul C. Ackerman et al., Defendants Below, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
November 17, 1964.
Reargument Denied December 4, 1964.
Howard M. Handelman, Wilmington, and Norman Annenberg, New York City, for appellant objector Ezzes.
Frank J. Miller, of Foulk, Walker, Miller & Wakefield, Wilmington, for appellant objector Koenigsberg.
Irving Morris and J. A. Rosenthal, of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- In re Trulia, Inc. Stockholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
- Mann v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.