Legal Opinion
Lockton v. O'ROURKE
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 2010No. Nos B208440, B212435PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
David B. Lockton appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after demurrers by defendants and respondents Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, and Richard A. Schirtzer and Michael O’Rourke and O’Rourke, McCloskey & Moody (collectively respondents) to the fifth amended complaint for legal malpractice. The demurrers were sustained without leave to amend on the ground the action was barred by the statute of limitations. He claims the trial court improperly based its ruling on facts that do not appear on the face of the fifth amended complaint and that the ruling…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Croucier v. ChavosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Gotek Energy, Inc. v. Socal IP Law Grp., LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Flake v. Neumiller & BeardsleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Aspiras v. Wells FargoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.