Legal Opinion

Flake v. Neumiller & Beardslee

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 2017No. C079790PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUARTE, J.

—Although the underlying litigation was apparently quite thorny, the issue presented by this appeal in a legal malpractice case is less complicated. Former counsel moved to withdraw from representing a client, alleging another attorney had agreed to handle—and was already handling— postjudgment motions, and that the other attorney would also handle the appeal of an adverse judgment. The client sued former counsel for malpractice more than one year after the motion to withdraw was made, but less than one year after the motion was granted. The question before us is whether the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  3. FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Beal Bank, SSB v. Arter & Hadden, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Sorenson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Jones v. SorensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Nguyen v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API