Hmielewski v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
GARBARINO, Judge.
¶ 1 The attorneys for the plaintiffs and a defendant in the underlying medical malpractice action appeal from sanctions imposed against them for conducting what the trial court characterized as a secret “sham” trial. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 This appeal arises out of a medical malpractice action. Cheryl Anne Newcomb was admitted to Scottsdale- Memorial Hospital for inducement of labor to deliver her first child. Mrs. Newcomb suffered complications, including massive bleeding, from which she died…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- City of Tucson v. GallagherArizona Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- In Re AlcornArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Stafford v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Kaufmann v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.