Legal Opinion
O'Neal v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1969No. Civ. 24806PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
This appeal was taken from an order denying a peremptory writ of mandate, the effect of which was to uphold the removal by the San Francisco Police Commission of a policeman, plaintiff and appellant Robert A. 0 ’Neal.
We are required, as was the superior court, to determine if there was any substantial evidence before the commission in support of its decision. We may not weigh evidence, determine the credibility of witnesses or resolve conflicts. (Sultan Turkish Bath, Inc. v. Board of Police Comrs., 169 Cal.App.2d 188 [337 P.2d 203].) We therefore state the evidence as it tends to support the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Boyd v. PendegastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Hostetter v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sultan Turkish Bath, Inc. v. BOARD OF POLICE COMRS. OF CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Reed v. City Council of City of RosevilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perea v. FalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Harmon v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Barber v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- California School Employees Association v. Jefferson Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Newman v. City of Oakland Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.