Legal Opinion
Barber v. Retirement Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1971No. Civ. 28006PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, J.
Herman M. Barber appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of mandate directing respondent, Retirement Board of the City and County of San Francisco (hereafter Board) to vacate its directive compelling him to retire pursuant to section 171.1.3 of the city charter because of a permanent disability incurred in the performance of duty. Barber contends: 1) the Board construed section 171.1.3 of the charter in an unreasonable manner; 2) the civil service commission’s finding that he was medically qualified in a prior final proceeding was res judicata; 3) the Board’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Sultan Turkish Bath, Inc. v. BOARD OF POLICE COMRS. OF CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- O'Neal v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nolan v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Mayor of Baltimore v. HackelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Craver v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Harmon v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Summerford v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.