Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Pendegast
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1922No. Civ. No. 3888PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Appellant, having been removed from his position as a member of the police force of the city of Los Angeles, brought this proceeding in the superior court asking that a writ be issued requiring defendants to certify for review the record of the proceedings had and evidence taken upon which the order of removal was made. A demurrer was interposed to the petition and sustained. Judgment dismissing the proceeding followed. From that judgment petitioner has appealed.
By the demurrer of defendants several objections to the petition were urged, only one of which need be here considered. The general…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte Duncan N. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Conner v. . the Mayor, C. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Reagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Speed v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Matter of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Landis v. TedderSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Nider v. City CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.