Legal Opinion
Reed v. City Council of City of Roseville
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1943No. Civ. 6929PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Respondent herein filed in the Superior Court of Placer County a petition praying for a writ of mandate to issue to the City Council of Roseville and its members, the personnel board of said city and its members, and others. He alleged that in 1939 the charter of the city had been amended by the addition thereto of article XIX, providing a classified civil service system for certain positions in the employment of the city; that it was therein provided that any person holding a position in the city when the amendment took effect who had served six months should be considered as a permanent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola De Beneficencia MutuaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Gastineau v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Zumwalt v. Trustees of California State CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Ware v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- O'Neal v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- United Aircraft Corporation v. Lodge 971 of the International Association of MacHinistsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.