Harmon v. Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiff, a deputy sheriff, has appealed from a judgment which denied his petition for writ of mandate, in which he sought review (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) of a decision of the defendant board which adopted the proposed decision of a referee that the plaintiff was able to perform the duties of a deputy sheriff, despite his claim that he was permanently incapacitated physically for the performance of such duties as a result of injuries received in a service-connected accident on March 18, 1972. His sole contention on appeal is that there is no substantial evidence that he is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Le Strange v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Redner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- County of Alameda v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- McConville v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Phillips v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Jeffers v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- San Francisco Unified Sch. Dist. v. STATE OF CALIFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.