Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Board of Retirement

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1976No. Civ. 37110PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Plaintiff, a deputy sheriff, has appealed from a judgment which denied his petition for writ of mandate, in which he sought review (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) of a decision of the defendant board which adopted the proposed decision of a referee that the plaintiff was able to perform the duties of a deputy sheriff, despite his claim that he was permanently incapacitated physically for the performance of such duties as a result of injuries received in a service-connected accident on March 18, 1972. His sole contention on appeal is that there is no substantial evidence that he is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Le Strange v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Redner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. McConville v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Phillips v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Jeffers v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. San Francisco Unified Sch. Dist. v. STATE OF CALIFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API