Legal Opinion

NORTHWESTERN NAT. BANK, ETC. v. Hilton & Associates

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1965No. 39592PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

The single issue presented by this case is whether an unliquidated tort claim is subject to garnishment.

Plaintiff commenced an action against defendants on two claims, the first on two promissory notes and the second for conversion of accounts receivable assigned as security therefor. At the same time, plaintiff commenced garnishment proceedings against the garnishees. Both garnishees disclosed nothing due and owing from them to defendants.

Plaintiff then moved the court for leave to serve and file a supplemental complaint to make both garnishees parties to the main action,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Knudson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. S. T. McKnight Co. v. TomkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Lind v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Rintala v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  3. In Re CarlsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
  4. In Re MedillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  5. Midland Credit Management v. ChatmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API