Lind v. Hurd
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $1,232 upon certain promissory notes. Erom an order, Fish, J., granting the motion of Charles E. Ryberg to dismiss the garnishment proceedings and discharging the garnishees, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the district court of Hennepin county, dismissing a garnishment proceeding in the above entitled-action, and discharging the garnishee.
In May, 1919, the defendant Anna M. Perkins obtained a verdict of a jury in the district court of Hennepin county against D. J. Orfield and Andrew V. Lien, for $800, damages for a fraud practiced upon her in a *191real estate transaction. At the time of the service of the garnishee summons on February 9, 1920, an appeal from an order denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial in the fraud case was pending in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilde v. MahaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Lehmann v. FarwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Detroit Post & Tribune Co. v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Dibrell v. NeelyMississippi Supreme Court · 1883
- Ulrich v. HowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- NORTHWESTERN NAT. BANK, ETC. v. Hilton & AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Northwestern National Bank v. Delta Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Lloyd v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925