Legal Opinion

S. T. McKnight Co. v. Tomkinson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1941No. 32,667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff from orders discharging the garnishee and refusing to vacate that discharge.

February 16, 1940, the date of the garnishment summons, defendant, Tomkinson, was liable as endorser upon two promissory notes made by the Diamond Tire Sales, Inc., now bankrupt, of which he is president, payable to the garnishee bank on which the principal due aggregated $5,373.06. As collateral for one of the notes, certain uncollected accounts receivable of Diamond, having a face value of $6,029.02, had been pledged. As additional collateral, the garnishee held a note for $5,000…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knudson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Bacon v. FelthousSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Carlson v. StaffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Central State Bank v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Lundstrom v. HedgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Rintala v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  3. NORTHWESTERN NAT. BANK, ETC. v. Hilton & AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. ARATEX SERVICES, INC. v. Blue Horse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Northern Engineering Co. Inc. v. NeukomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API