Rintala v. Shoemaker
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
The question presented is whether a Minnesota resident as plaintiff, suing in this court a resident of the State of Michigan as defendant on a wrongful death cause of action arising out of an automobile accident occurring in Florida, may obtain jurisdiction quasi in rem over defendant by garnisheeing the defendant’s insurer which does business in Minnesota and most if not all states in the United States and by personal service on defendant in Michigan. Such meager case authority as exists is divided and the question has never been presented to nor decided by this court…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Javorek v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Anderson v. LuitjensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Savchuk v. RushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Baker v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.