Legal Opinion
Midland Credit Management v. Chatman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 2011No. A10-1241PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of his claim that funds he received in settlement of a personal-injury claim are exempt from garnishment. We affirm.
FACTS
In 2006, respondent Midland Credit Management (Midland) obtained a money judgment against appellant Eldridge Chat-man. In 2008, Chatman suffered personal injuries and commenced a lawsuit. In 2009, Chatman settled the lawsuit and deposited the settlement proceeds into his bank account. In 2010, Midland garnished *535Chatman’s bank account. In response to the garnishment, Chatman filed a notice of exemption,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Medill v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re CarlsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- Molde v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Chippewa Valley Ethanol Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In re: Guardianship and Conservatorship of Carolyn H. Jemison.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Jovani Nassar v. Fady ChamounCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014