Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Berger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 1939No. Appeals, 29 and 30PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Mr. Justice Barnes,
These two appeals were argued together, and will be considered in one opinion, as they present identical questions for determination.
The plaintiffs, Mary C. Cameron and Robert A. Con-every, brought separate actions against the defendant, Loretta J. Berger, for injuries resulting from a collision, which took place on November 18, 1931, between an automobile owned and operated by Mrs. Berger and one owned by Conevery, which was being driven at the time of the accident by Mrs. Cameron.
The Pennsylvania Indemnity Corporation, which is here the garnishee, insured the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Zenner v. Goetz (Travelers Ind. Co.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- A. Rose & Son, Inc. v. Zurich General Accident, Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Darcy v. HARTFORD INS. CO. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Zitnik v. BurikIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
- International Diamond Importers, Ltd. v. Singularity Clark, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.