A. Rose & Son, Inc. v. Zurich General Accident, Etc., Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
This case calls for a more detailed explanation of what was intended to be included in the exception mentioned in Greene Co. v. Southern Surety Co., 292 Pa. 304, 311, where “life insurance policies and mortgage clauses in fire insurance” were mentioned as cases in which it has been universally held that a third party beneficiary could sue. It is not to be supposed that there is any particular virtue in the terms “life insurance,” or “fire insurance,” or that these were used in an exclusive sense. The reasons for sustaining a third party beneficiary action in such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Knights of Joseph B. & L. Ass'n v. Mechanics' Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Trustee Building & Loan Ass'n v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Strutz v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Scott v. Freeport Motor Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Associated Indemnity Corp. of San Francisco v. McAlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.