Zenner v. Goetz (Travelers Ind. Co.)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
Appellant, defendant’s liability insurance carrier, was brought into the case by garnishment proceedings after plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant. As garnishee it now complains of the entry of judgment against it on the ground that plaintiff failed to show liability under the poíicy issued, and hence that its motion for judgment n. o. v. should have been granted.
Plaintiff sued defendant in an action for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from defendant’s negli gent operation of his automobile. Appellant’s counsel entered their appearance for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Home Benefit Assn. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- O'Neill v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.