Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1928No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Conroy, plaintiff, engaged as an automobile salesman, insured against liability for injuries to others, while his car was employed for business or pleasure purposes. On the day of the accident which gave rise to the present controversy, he prepared to visit a boys’ camp located some distance from his home. Before leaving, the Merritts, friends of the family, called, and, upon invitation, agreed to accompany him on the trip. While returning the automobile was upset with resulting injury to one of the occupants, of which fact notice was given to the defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Young v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Flanigan v. McLeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Schoenfeld v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Ferrell v. SolskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Porter v. . Traders' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API