Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Zollino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 7, 2012No. SC 18654PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J.

This case raises the question of whether the putative father of a child, upon learning that he was deceived by his wife, the child’s mother, and the child’s biological father as to the child’s paternity, is estopped from recovering from the biological father funds that the putative father expended to raise the child while believing her to be his offspring. The plaintiff, Eric Fischer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court 1 rendered in favor of the defendant, Richard Zollino, after the trial court concluded that the doctrine of equitable estoppel and public policy…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Knill v. KnillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hornung v. HornungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LorsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Cadco, Ltd. v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Carpender v. SigelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API