Legal Opinion

Hornung v. Hornung

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 20, 2016No. SC19361PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The defendant, Robert Hornung, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court setting forth financial orders incident to the dissolution of his marriage to the plaintiff, Marjorie Hornung. In those orders, the trial court directed the defendant to pay to the plaintiff, inter alia, lump sum alimony in the amount of $7.5 million and attorney's fees in the amount of $140,000. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court: (1) improperly rendered a lump sum alimony award that constitutes a property distribution in violation of the parties' prenuptial agreement (agreement); and (2) abused…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powell-Ferri v. FerriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. Burton v. Dept. of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  3. Jepsen v. CamassarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Jenzack Partners, LLC v. Stoneridge Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Mason v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API