Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lorson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 10, 2018No. AC38806PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElgo, J.
The defendants, Eric Lorson and Laurin Maday, appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly found that the plaintiff met its burden of proving its prima facie case and that the defendants failed to prove their special defenses of equitable estoppel and unclean hands. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The defendants and the McCue Mortgage Company (McCue) executed a promissory note on December 1, 2008…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Kolbe v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LorsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Goshen Mortgage, LLC v. AndroulidakisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- A & R Enterprises, LLC v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LorsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Jolley v. VintonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.