Legal Opinion

Knill v. Knill

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 1986No. 39, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

We shall decide in this case whether a husband may be required to support a child who, though born to his wife during wedlock, was not sired by him.

We set forth the salient facts as follows. Charles and Cledythe Knill had been married for ten years and had two children at the time of Stephen’s birth in 1970. One and one-half years before Stephen’s birth, Charles had undergone a full vasectomy, and the parties agree that Stephen is not Charles’s son. Charles apparently forgave Cledythe for her infidelity because the marriage continued for another twelve years with Stephen being…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Rand v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Inlet Associates v. Assateague House Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Creveling v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Murphy v. MerzbacherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Holzman v. Fiola Blum, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API