Legal Opinion

Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 4, 2012No. AC 33312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The defendant, Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in this commercial lease action. The defendant claims that the court erred in (1) finding that, by the defendant’s conduct, it impliedly waived notice requirements under the lease, (2) awarding damages to the plaintiff Milford Paintball, LLC,1 by virtue of its improper construction of the terms of the parties’ lease agreement, (3) concluding that the plaintiff was entitled to recover damages because its conduct violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Brazauskas v. Fort Wayne-South Bend Diocese, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Webster Bank v. OakleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. S.H.V.C., Inc. v. RoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Afkari-Ahmadi v. Fotovat-AhmadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Channing Real Estate, LLC v. GatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API