Legal Opinion
The Procter & Gamble Company v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1966No. 15769PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Chief Judge.
This is a proceeding to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission requiring The Procter & Gamble Company to divest assets of Clorox Chemical Company alleged to have been acquired by it in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. 15 U.S.C. § 18.
The complaint filed by the Federal Trade Commission was served on October 7, 1957. It alleged that Procter is the leading producer in the United States of soap and detergent products, which it sells under brand names, and a major producer of other consumer products sold under brand names. The complaint further alleged that on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Purex Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Company, and the Clorox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co. And Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Purex Corporation, Ltd., a Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.