Legal Opinion
Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co. And Clorox Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1981No. 80-5304PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Purex appeals from the judgment entered by the district court in favor of Procter & Gamble and Clorox (hereinafter appellees). We note jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1976). We affirm for the reasons set forth below.
I
INTRODUCTION 1
Purex commenced this action in 1967, immediately after the Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Trade Commission’s order requiring Procter & Gamble to divest itself of Clorox. FTC v. Procter & Gamble, 386 U.S. 568, 87 S.Ct. 1224, 18 L.Ed.2d 303 (1967). Purex alleged that it had been injured as a result of the acquisition of Clorox by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- California Computer Products, Inc. And Century Data Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- David Yashon, M.D. v. Ian W. Gregory, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Betaseed, Inc. v. U & I Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Rockefeller Center Construction Corp. v. Sonoma v (In Re Sonoma V)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.