Legal Opinion

Pirillo v. Barber Asphalt Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1940No. Appeal, 42PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The question before us is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of the compensation board that claimant’s husband died as a result of an accident. The lower court set aside the award and entered judgment for defendant. This judgment will be affirmed.

Decedent’s business had been that of a small cement contractor but when not so engaged he had worked as a laborer for defendant, patching concrete pavements and other similar work. While so employed in September 1935, he ruptured the biceps muscle of his right arm. An operation was performed, suturing the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Harring v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Amentlar v. New Upper Lehigh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Pastva v. Forge Coal Min. Co., Ap.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Cope v. Philadelphia Toilet Laundry & Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Barker v. Narragansett Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1940
  5. Cole v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API