Legal Opinion

Cole v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1962No. Appeal, No. 33PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

In this case under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the Board found upon sufficient and competent evidence (inter alia) that, “. . . in August, 1955 the claimant was employed by the Pennsylvania Power & Light Company as a line worker. During said period the area in which the claimant worked was flooded by a flash flood and the claimant’s duties required him to work in said area, trouble-shooting and repairing damage to Company facilities caused by the flood.

*650“. . . the defendant company arranged for and notified their employees to get their first para-typhoid vaccine…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Billo v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Wance v. Gettig Engineering & Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. City of New Castle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Findon v. Nick ChevroletSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API