Cole v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
In this case under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the Board found upon sufficient and competent evidence (inter alia) that, “. . . in August, 1955 the claimant was employed by the Pennsylvania Power & Light Company as a line worker. During said period the area in which the claimant worked was flooded by a flash flood and the claimant’s duties required him to work in said area, trouble-shooting and repairing damage to Company facilities caused by the flood.
*650“. . . the defendant company arranged for and notified their employees to get their first para-typhoid vaccine…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Billo v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Wance v. Gettig Engineering & Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- City of New Castle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Findon v. Nick ChevroletSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.