Legal Opinion

Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1925No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

On July 14, 1923, David H. Gausman was totally disabled by a stroke of apoplexy and, claiming it was the result of an accident sustained in the course of his employment by R. T. Pearson Company, defendant, presented this claim for compensation. The referee’s award in claimant’s favor was affirmed by the compensation board and lower court and therefrom defendant brought this appeal.

Claimant, who was seventy-four years of age and afflicted with chronic nephritis and arterio-sclerosis, accompanied by high blood pressure, was working as a carpenter, laying flooring,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Stahl v. Watson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API