Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Cunningham, J.,
Opinion by
The employer and its insurance carrier have appealed in this workmen’s compensation case from the judgment entered in the court below upon an award of compensation to the claimant for total disability, held to be attributable to a “personal injury......by an accident, in the course of his employment.” The fundamental issue is whether there was competent proof of an “injury by an accident,” within the meaning of Section 301 of our Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 77 PS §§411 and 431. The portion of the “physical structure” of claimant’s body…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Smith v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Deesch v. Emmaus BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Ferraro v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- In Re SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.