Legal Opinion
State v. Orde
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 30, 2010No. 2009-737PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, David Orde, appeals his conviction for manufacture of a controlled drug. See RSA 318-B:2 (Supp. 2009). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court {Barry, J.) erred by denying his motions to suppress. We reverse and remand.
The record supports the following facts. On July 29,2008, Officer Angelo Corrado of the Hollis Police Department went to the defendant’s home to serve a dog complaint. The defendant’s home is in a residential neighborhood, with trees lining the edge of his property. The driveway leading from the road to the home is approximately thirty or forty feet long and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. Rodney J. DaoustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Thomas Jeffrey Raines, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- State v. OhlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BeaucheminSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. LantagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. Daniel Jesus CoraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. NewcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. SchulzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.