Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodney J. Daoust
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 18, 1990No. 89-2115PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Chief Judge.
Rodney Daoust appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of firearms by a convicted felon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6), (g)(1) and (h)(1). He argues that the district court should have suppressed the firearms as evidence at his trial, because, in his view, the police seized them in violation of the fourth amendment. We disagree with Daoust, and we affirm his conviction.
Daoust makes two arguments. First, he claims that the search warrant which authorized the police to seize a weapon from his house was invalid. The warrant permitted the officers to seize a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Estate Robert Smith v. MarascoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert JubicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. MartinsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.