Legal Opinion
State v. Schulz
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 4, 2012No. 2011-606PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
The defendant, Logan Schulz, appeals his convictions for being an accomplice to possession of cocaine, see RSA 318-B:2 (2011); RSA 626:8 (2007), and an accomplice to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, see RSA 318-B:2, :26 (2011); RSA 626:8. He argues that the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) erred in denying his motion to suppress because the search warrant for his home was unconstitutional both on its face and in its execution. We reverse and remand.
*220I
The relevant facts are not disputed. On October 29, 2010, Officer Brandon Ailing of the Haverhill Police Department went to the home…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GermainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State of New Hampshire v. Michael FrancisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State of New Hampshire v. Hillman Blesdell-MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. DaltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State of New Hampshire v. Hillman Blesdell-MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.