State v. Beauchemin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Brian A. Beauchemin, appeals his conviction following a bench trial on the violation level offense of baiting for wildlife during the closed season. See RSA 207:3-d, I (Supp. 2010); N.H. Admin. RULES, Fis 307.01(b). He argues that the Trial Court (Scheffy, J.) erred when it denied his motion to suppress and when it ruled that corn and salt-rich mineral blocks are covered substances within the definition of baiting under RSA 207:1, Il-a (Supp. 2010). We affirm.
The record reveals the following facts. It is illegal to bait for wildlife between April 15 and August 31. See N.H.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. OrdeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. MacElmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. ThielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. BreedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SchulzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- In re ReganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. MATTONSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Gentry v. Warden, Northern New Hampshire Correctional FacilitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.