Legal Opinion

State v. Beauchemin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 2011No. 2010-171PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The defendant, Brian A. Beauchemin, appeals his conviction following a bench trial on the violation level offense of baiting for wildlife during the closed season. See RSA 207:3-d, I (Supp. 2010); N.H. Admin. RULES, Fis 307.01(b). He argues that the Trial Court (Scheffy, J.) erred when it denied his motion to suppress and when it ruled that corn and salt-rich mineral blocks are covered substances within the definition of baiting under RSA 207:1, Il-a (Supp. 2010). We affirm.

The record reveals the following facts. It is illegal to bait for wildlife between April 15 and August 31. See N.H.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. OrdeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. State v. MacElmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. State v. ThielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. State v. BreedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SchulzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  2. In re ReganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  4. State v. MATTONSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  5. Gentry v. Warden, Northern New Hampshire Correctional FacilitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API