Legal Opinion

State v. Ohling

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 1984No. 8209 2048; CA A28859PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*251GILLETTE, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for manufacturing a controlled substance, arising from the discovery of over 30 marijuana plants growing in pots along the side of a deck in the back of his house. He argues that the officers who discovered the plants were without authority to be where they were when they did so and that the discovery was therefore illegal. The trial court denied his motion to suppress, and he was convicted after a stipulated facts trial. We reverse and remand.

Defendant lives on the east side of Muddy Creek in rural Linn County. The area is generally…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smith v. McDuffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. WestlundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. PortreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. SomflethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. Hitesman/PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API