Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Beecher v. Gilliam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1927No. 20771. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

The city of Seattle brought this action to condemn land for an improvement known as the Denny Hill Degrade No. 2. Beecher and wife were named defendants, as they were the owners of a lot at the northeast corner of Eighth and Westlake avenues. This lot had a frontage on two streets by reason of the fact that Westlake avenue intersects Eighth avenue at a wide angle. Its frontage consisted of 51.68 feet on Eighth avenue, and 11 feet on West-lake avenue. The lot is one hundred twenty feet in depth and approximately sixty feet in width. The regrade improvement called for a widening of Eighth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ryan v. North Alaska Salmon Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Schuchard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In re Third, Fourth & Fifth Avenues, SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Merchant v. District Court for St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Gregg v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. City of Seattle v. Lake Union Brick Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Barry M. & Mary Beth Gardner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Town of Sumner v. FryarWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API