Legal Opinion

Ryan v. North Alaska Salmon Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1908No. S.F. No. 4568PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

J.—The complaint charged that Orion F. Ryan met his death in the territory of Alaska through the negligence of the defendant company by which he was employed. Plaintiff sues to recover damages for the death so occasioned, not as the personal representative, but as his mother and sole surviving heir. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 377.) The complaint is silent as to the laws of the territory of Alaska, and defendant’s general demurrer for lack of facts was sustained by the court without leave to amend, and the action was accordingly dismissed.

The demurrer was properly sustained. Where the action, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Stewart v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Estate of SchluttigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API