Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Merchant v. District Court for St. Louis County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1896No. Nos. 10,171-(53)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari to review the action of the district court for St. Louis county, Morris, J., in confirming the report and award of appraisers.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Certiorari to review the action of the district court in confirming the report of appraisers appointed to appraise the value of property proposed to be taken by the city of Duluth for parkway purposes, pursuant to the provisions of Sp. Laws 1889, c. 401, as amended by Sp. Laws 1891, c. 54.

Section 7 of the amendatory act, after providing for the appointment of appraisers, further provides:

“They [the appraisers] shall view said property, and ’hear all the legal evidence offered by the board [of park commissioners] or any person interested in the property, and shall ascertain and appraise the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arbrush v. Town of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schuchard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Edwards v. BruortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Schmid v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Gregg v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API