Legal Opinion

Schuchard v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1908No. 7504PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered May 14, 1908, confirming an assessment for benefits by a local improvement in condemnation proceedings instituted by a city, upon an appeal from an order of the city council confirming the assessment.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

— Ordinance No. 13,102 of the city of Seattle, approved December 18, 1905, provided for the regrade of Jackson street, and numerous other streets, avenues and alleys in that city. After reciting that public necessity demanded the regrade and that the improvement would be of especial benefit to certain lands and premises and other property, the ordinance established the grades of the several streets, and directed the corporation counsel to file a petition in the superior court complying with the laws of the state, and praying that just compensation be made for the property and property "rights…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. MecartneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Merchant v. District Court for St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Davis v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  4. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. East Hoquiam Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Seattle & Puget Sound Packing Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hapgood v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Inner-Circle Property Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API