Guho v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground that the judgment appealed from has been paid and fully satisfied.
In a complaint containing only one count, the plaintiff sought to recover a balance of $10,484.91 for certain work done for the defendant city under a written contract, the further sum of $16,759.82 for extra work alleged to have been done in connection with the work covered by the contract, and an additional $10,193.15 for damages alleged to have been caused by the interference of the defendant’s agents with the work in question, making a total demand of $37,437.88. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Walnut Irrigation Dist. v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- In Re Estate of AyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Mathys v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Watson v. McEwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Menges v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.