Legal Opinion

Storke v. Storke

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1901No. L.A. No. 767PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County denying a motion to dismiss a motion for new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

— This appeal is from an order denying a motion made by plaintiff to dismiss the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

On the 16th of January, 1895, the court made and caused to be entered a final judgment dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the ground of defendant’s extreme cruelty. This judgment awarded defendant $250 for alimony and $200 for attorney’s fees and costs. After the entry thereof, and before any notice of intention to move for a new trial had been given, plaintiff paid to defendant, and defendant accepted, the said $450 so…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . Van SyckelNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Shaver v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Garner v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Boggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Bourne v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. In Re Estate of HubbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Patterson v. KeeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Browning v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API