Legal Opinion
Watson v. McEwen
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1964No. Civ. 7174PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
Santa Ana River Development Company (hereinafter referred to as SARDC) was the owner of certain leased premises in Riverside County which included a portion of the Santa Ana River approximately 3 miles downstream from Prado Dam. Defendant MeEwen was the lessee and operated a service station, café and a camping, picnic, swimming and wading area on the leased premises. The lease was dated June 15, 1953, and MeEwen had been in possession of the leased premises for several years before the date of injury. Plaintiff Sylvia Watson (hereinafter referred to as Sylvia) received injuries while swimming…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Burroughs v. Ben's Auto Park, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Thomas v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Winzler & Kelly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.