In Re Netflix Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this putative antitrust class action, defendant Netflix, Inc., moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ antitrust claims for lack of standing and for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs have demonstrated that they have standing to bring a Walker Process claim. Defendant has shown, however, that plaintiffs have not pleaded a sufficient level of patent enforcement against Net-flix’s potential competitors, so plaintiffs’ federal antitrust claims fail. Plaintiffs also bring state-law claims. To the extent that they are based on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Xpertuniverse, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2010
- Jersey Asparagus Farms, Inc. v. Rutgers UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. SanDisk Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.