Legal Opinion
Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. SanDisk Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 24, 2011No. Case 5:10-cv-02787-JF/HRLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER 1 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 25, 2010, Plaintiff Ritz Camera & Image, LLC (“Ritz”) filed the instant action against Defendants SanDisk Corporation (“SanDisk”) and Eliyahou Harari (“Harari”), alleging violations of § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2 (“Sherman Act”). Ritz filed its first amended complaint (“FAC”) as of right on August 25, 2010. On behalf of a purported class, Ritz asserts claims for conspiracy to monopolize and monopolization of the flash memory market. In…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- ESCO Corp. v. Cashman Equipment Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Jersey Asparagus Farms, Inc. v. Rutgers UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.