Legal Opinion

Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape Commission

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 20, 2009No. 1:07-cv-1610 OWW SMSPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER [GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART] DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND [DENYING] DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. 19)

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, The California Table Grape Commission (“Commission”), moves to dis miss Plaintiffs’ Delano Farms Company (“Delano”), Four Star Fruit, Inc. (“Four Star”), and Gerawan Farming, Inc. (“Gerawan”), entire complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(a), claiming the United States is a necessary party, and moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b),…

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Webkinz Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  2. A123 SYSTEMS, INC. v. Hydro-QuebecDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  3. Bluestar Genomics v. SongDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc. v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Kristiansen v. AldaoudDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API