Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. General Electric Co.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided August 23, 2010No. Case 5:10CV05087 JHPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. (collectively “Mitsubishi”), allege that General Electric Company has violated the antitrust laws by monopolizing and attempting to monopolize the market in the United States for variable speed wind turbines in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. According to the complaint, GE has monopolized and attempted to monopolize the market by obtaining patents by fraud and enforcing those patents through sham litigation, which has had the effect of excluding Mitsubishi…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Apotex, Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
  3. United States v. BameDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  4. Adams, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022
  5. DSM IP Assets, B.V. v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API